Friday, March 4, 2016

Texas Attorney General Faces Anal Probe after Gay Marriage.

Sorry, I've just been told that the headline is wrong. It should read, Texas Attorney faces ETHICS probe OVER Gay Marriage. I apologize for that.
Ken Paxton
Ken Paxton, another hetero-bashing faggot bold upstanding man, is trying to stop gays from jumping into the hellfire of "holy" matrimony. Clearly, Special Needs Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton thinks that only heterosexuals should be punished by the government for having sexual relations.

In the securities fraud case, Ken Paxton is accused of failing to disclose he was being paid by a technology startup while trying to lure investors and not disclosing that he already had 100,000 shares. Those charges carry punishments of five to 99 years in prison.

Ken Paxton is also charged with rendering services as an investment adviser without being registered with the state, a charge that carries a penalty of two to 10 years in prison.

Ken Paxton
Ken Paxton - What a WINNER!

In other news, a woman is being seen by democrats as being too good looking to be serving in a public office.
Kathleen Kane
It appears that Kathleen Kane is considered good-looking, and only 1 democrat stood by her when she was trying to be voted out of office. Democrats are afraid that men seeing her on T.V. may become sexually aroused, and are trying to replace her with a much less attractive woman - something along the lines of Hillary Clinton, or a Flying Monkey from the Wizard of Oz - or worse - Nancy Pelosi.

Rumor has it, Kathleen Kane is also covering for a man caught for exhibiting heterosexual behavior; something that is definitely not tolerated in the United Sodomites of Ass-rape.

State Supreme Court Justice J. Michael Eakin was caught finding several of his female co-workers attractive.
J. Michael Eakin
Keep in mind that if he found MALE co-workers sexually attractive (and was caught sending E-mails discussing that), he would suffer no punishment - as anybody trying to punish him would be labeled as "homophobic".

No women were raped, beaten, molested or harassed by State Supreme Court Justice J. Michael Eakin. He has always viewed domestic violence as a crime. He was caught sending E-mails to friends that contained HETERO-sexually explicit content - something that is referred to as "sexist", "misogynistic" and all kinds of vile terms, when in fact, it is just the male sex-drive. Again, if the E-mails were in reference to finding MALE co-workers sexually attractive - nobody would attack him - as that would be considered "homophobic".

Why is it that many women (and men) are trying to destroy the male sex-drive while claiming to represent "equality"? How will eliminating the HETEROSEXUAL male sex-drive and frowning on campy HETERO-sexual innuendos among male friends ensure that women are treated equally under the law. Why is it that homosexual behavior does not mean that men are treated unfairly? If heterosexual behavior from men is considered "sexist", "misogynistic" and degrading to women, shouldn't homosexual behavior from men be considered "sexist" and "misandric" and degrading to...
Enjoy looking at a picture of a stupid little cunt who: thinks she is out of your "league", thinks that men getting raped is funny, screams bloody murder when a woman is raped, shouts "you go girl" when a woman hits a man, screams bloody murder when a man hits a woman, thinks she is too good to talk to you, would be happy to spend all of your money on shoes and not give a crap if you had any money left over to buy food, thinks she is too good to talk to you, thinks you are a creep/creepy if you find her attractive, and would laugh if you got your penis cut off.
Boy! They just don't get any more "angelic" than this!

Remember - we live in a misogynistic society...