In the securities fraud case, Ken Paxton is accused of failing to disclose he was being paid by a technology startup while trying to lure investors and not disclosing that he already had 100,000 shares. Those charges carry punishments of five to 99 years in prison.
Ken Paxton is also charged with rendering services as an investment adviser without being registered with the state, a charge that carries a penalty of two to 10 years in prison.
In other news, a woman is being seen by democrats as being too good looking to be serving in a public office.
Rumor has it, Kathleen Kane is also covering for a man caught for exhibiting heterosexual behavior; something that is definitely not tolerated in the United Sodomites of Ass-rape.
State Supreme Court Justice J. Michael Eakin was caught finding several of his female co-workers attractive.
No women were raped, beaten, molested or harassed by State Supreme Court Justice J. Michael Eakin. He has always viewed domestic violence as a crime. He was caught sending E-mails to friends that contained HETERO-sexually explicit content - something that is referred to as "sexist", "misogynistic" and all kinds of vile terms, when in fact, it is just the male sex-drive. Again, if the E-mails were in reference to finding MALE co-workers sexually attractive - nobody would attack him - as that would be considered "homophobic".
Why is it that many women (and men) are trying to destroy the male sex-drive while claiming to represent "equality"? How will eliminating the HETEROSEXUAL male sex-drive and frowning on campy HETERO-sexual innuendos among male friends ensure that women are treated equally under the law. Why is it that homosexual behavior does not mean that men are treated unfairly? If heterosexual behavior from men is considered "sexist", "misogynistic" and degrading to women, shouldn't homosexual behavior from men be considered "sexist" and "misandric" and degrading to...
Remember - we live in a misogynistic society...