Monday, December 21, 2015

Jennifer Fichter caught having Sex with 17 Year Old Men

A very interesting post at Eivind Berg's Blog about a 30 year old female teacher that was caught having sex with multiple 17 year old students.

Before reading further, I encourage you to read the link to Eivind Berg's Blog first.

I found a better link to the news story here.

The prosecutor said that just because Fichter is female, and her male students were willing participants, does not make them any less victimized.

Crap - I remember being 17 and in high-school - there were several teachers that I wished would have "victimized" my brains out - and whose brains I would have like to "victimized" out!.

Now, I do not consider Jennifer Fichter as a "monster" (or even a pedophile).

Jennifer Fichter


She is going to be sentenced to 22 years in prison. Do I think that is wrong?  Absolutely.  If I were a 17 year old young man - I would certainly want to have sex with a teacher looking like her (ignore the crying - she is good looking).

Here is a better picture - but blurry...
Jennifer Fichter


But - I am faced with a moral dilemma here.  I agree that humans are sexualized beings, and I have no problem with the age difference here.

What I have a problem with is - would Jennifer Fichter help a man in the same predicament as herself?  That is, would Jennifer Fichter help a 30 year old man having sex with multiple 17 year old female students?

What about all the other people who think Jennifer Fichter should be granted leniency - or skip jail altogether?  Would they do the same for a male in the same predicament?

I honestly cannot see anybody helping out a man in a similar predicament (except people like myself - a small handful of people I would guess)...

I want anybody reading this to give me a reason why I should help Jennifer Fichter get out of this predicament.  A GOOD REASON WHY I SHOULD HELP ANY WOMAN FOR THAT MATTER.

I want anybody out there to also explain to me how helping Jennifer Fichter out of her predicament will help improve the sexual liberation of men - and end the sexual tyranny of feminism/post-feminism.

Thank you in advance for your input.

(I have already promised Eivind Berg that if I get a good answer - I will fight to get her out of jail to the best of my ability - that applies to answers given here too).

23 comments:

  1. If we don't help her, who will? Feminists are happy to apply the same laws to women, because feminism is more about sex-hostility in general than giving women special benefits. Women being sentenced to draconian punishments for victimless sex crimes is now so common that anyone who thinks feminists would quit persecuting sexuality once the same laws hurt women have been proven wrong.

    Perhaps Jennifer Fichter would have cared nothing about helping a man in a similar predicament. But that shouldn't stop us from supporting her, because what happened to her is still wrong and no one deserves to be in prison just for their opinions. Tyranny must be consistently opposed, in my opinion, and not just when it happens to sympathetic people. To break the cycle of oppression, we have to set the example that we don't tolerate this sort of persecution under any circumstances. Feminists already proved that they really mean it when they want equal injustice for all. Now let us fight for equal justice instead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree - this is tyranny - 22 years in prison for having sex with 17 year olds, but it appears that she also had sex with an 8th grader (13-15) - but that still doesn't justify 22 years in prison.

      I have been diving down the Jennifer Fichter rabbit hole for about 3-4 hours now - and it appears to be bottomless. I am trying to find out if there is any feminist support for her - so far - nothing.

      Most of the support for her is coming from Russia (from what I have found so far).

      Delete
  2. I will represent MRHM here and welcome to real equality, all crimes are genderless and no freebies for anyone, she did the crime, she will do the time We can't have unprofessional pedophiles running around chasing their students.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I appreciate that point of view too - but - how many of these young men were curious - and the sex was entirely consensual? All of it I would guess...

      How many male teachers are in prison now - because they were very good looking, and their female students (under aged) were curious and overly flirty?

      I do not think people in those situations should be in prison.

      Sexual predators seek to do HARM using sex.

      Many rape victims are KILLED during a rape (real rape - not the feminist definition of rape).

      I think of people like Warren Jeffs, the Mormon Cult Leader - he allegedly raped young prepubescent boys (no lubricant). The boys he raped were sons of his brother I think - a brother he hated for reasons I forget...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Jeffs

      This is not a loving affectionate human - this is somebody who seeks to do harm using sex as their weapon.

      Delete
    2. Regarding the "unprofessional" aspect: If your mind wasn't so clouded by feminist sexual taboos that you can't think straight on the subject, you would know that the cure for unprofessional behavior is to have people fired, not lock them up for 22 years. Oh, and pedophiles are attracted to *prepubescent* children, not teenage boys, but I guess that is another distinction MHRAs are too dense to comprehend.

      Delete
  3. MRHM is obviously just an extension of the feminist movement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, but I would also say that much of the MRA/MGTOW is also an extension of feminism. Whether they realize it or not. I remember reading on Reddit that Wil Wheaton was a "privileged male" according to MRAs and MGTOWs... DEFINITELY a FEMINIST point of view - and DEFINITELY the reason I stopped reading Reddit...

      I'm still gathering data and brain-storming.

      Delete
  4. you just go blah and watch me not care one bit, but I would suggest everyone check their webpages for unwanted tracking cookies. According to my webpage analyzes, there is an overly high activity from igoos.net.ru. They use the worst cookies and can fuck up everything in 5 nano secs

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I Like Cookies - Molasses are my favorite.

      Bad joke - I know. One problem I have with the MHRM - they seem to want to do for men - what feminism did for women - perpetual victim status, oppression olympics etc...

      Add onto that, most of their members are homosexual men - just as many early feminists were lesbians.

      I do not care for them.

      Delete
    2. You know, that I want to protect boys and teenagers from harm. I agree certain MHRM are trying to victimize boys in the same way, that feminists did to women and it is wrong. But it is about consent and age issue. I have seen too many assholes use the standard phrase: "ooh he had an erection, so he isn't a victim".....while mens right activists are taking care of young guys, who are thinking or close to committing suicide ....it is heartbreaking. I want to stop it, but I don't create fake victims and become like the fucking hags either.

      It is mainly MGTOW and AVFM, who has the largest group of homosexual members and not the other groups. The transition from all activists were straight to different sexual orientations, it hasn't been successful in all the groups. We also had to get ride of gays looking for a date and women, who wanted to become MRA, because LOL they hated other women. So fucking weird and I don't want to deal with them.

      I know, that you are the expert and eat cookies for breakfast, but I am still scanning and checking if it is basic markers, when it is fine, but example: Russian igoos trackers (they use them at dating websites too) are bad and the online version of GPS. Each line have the following data: scan time, username, online / offline, the last activity, reason for the report, when.......fucked. And they get feedback within 3 fucking seconds, when you do something online. All the online activity/traffic is coming from France, same area, it increased 800% within 12 hours and .... not cool :Z


      Delete
  5. IF the MHRM truly believes that 17-year-old boys are incapable of consenting to sex, then it is their position that the age of consent in most of the world is too low, and we need to ramp up the feminist sex hysteria several notches and imprison millions more women and men for consensual sex. This is truly in the category of shit so insane that you can't even make it up, especially when these buffoons even manage to convince themselves that they are engaged in activism for men.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, I noticed that much of what the MHRM does is simply an extension of feminism - and preventing sex (at least heterosexual sex). AND - like early feminism - it is over-run with gays.

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If one needs "additional training in crime prevention" in order to understand that 17-year-old boys are victimized rather than lucky to score with older women, then that should tell us all we need to know about how nonsensical this supposed crime is. I suppose the "victims" should also be sent to reeducation camps to make sure they stop feeling lucky and start feeling traumatized? That is pretty much how the system is intended to work thanks to feminism, and you just want more of it. It is a sick world.

      Delete
  7. There are several legit mens movements in AUS/CAN/US, they are dvivided into men's lib, mens right -, mythopoetic - and pro-hags. We don't agree on several issues, why men's movement is just an overall term. In the 1970's men's lib split into two separat fragtions, one is us and the rest are the fucking manginas. Any REAL MHRM knows the difference between the two.
    I had to google you, because I don't deal with Norwegians and not on the Norwegian network. I wasn't a happy camper, when I read ..... My assessment and point blank: you have a private opinion about the subject, but education isn't your field of expertise and your don't have any additional training in crime prevention, so please go ...... and once again, watch me not care.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Also your argument is a fallacy, because according my country's law when Penal Code § 222, first paragraph. when sexual relations with a child, who under 15 years old, it is an offense, while we also have a special age limit of 18 years for sexual intercourse with a student, adopted child, stepchild or foster child. These rules exist for a reason and it is to protect young children and teenagers from harm.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Veritas:
    The earliest Age of Consent laws that I know of were instituted by the Romans somewhere around the time of the founding of the Republic, and the AOC was 12 for girls and there was no known law for boys. The law remained unchanged anywhere in Europe---it was raised only in the late 19th/early 20th Century in the Protestant Europe and the late 20th Century in Catholic/Orthodox Europe. It was because of feminist and Socialist pressure these ages were raised; not to protect anybody, but to assert Socialistic control over sexuality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Historically, when you would be correct, but what has science or biology shown us, that children starts puberty age 11-12 and their bodes needs to be fully mature before they starts getting interested in or have sex with other teenagers around their own age. They need to be curious, experiment and bond with other teenagers. It is the most healthy, while an adult mature sexuality should never be forced upon them.

      Why I am more comfortable with the laws recommendation of 15 age for boys and girls, and I would never accept age 12. §222 is genderless, thank god and boys should have the same protection as girls.

      Another fact: normal progression in sexuality: then men and women get older and more experienced women in the bedroom, we get more rough and test things, that we would never had done in our teenage years.
      In my female eyes, I look down upon the dysfunctional cougars, they are lesser women, who couldn't handle adult male sexuality or/and men around their own age.
      My private and none professional question is: who the wants to fuck teenagers or very young people? They are clueless and don't know anything. It's more fun to have an experienced partner, who knows, what he wants and not scared of trying new things.

      Link or example of development
      http://www.merckmanuals.com/home/children's-health-issues/growth-and-development/physical-growth-and-sexual-maturation-of-adolescents

      Delete
    3. Veritas:
      It would seem though, following your logic that experience counts heavily, that younger people would benefit from having a more experienced sexual partner rather than pairing with someone else who was inexperienced.

      I am in agreement about puberty being necessary first, but I'm skeptical of the science behind prolonging or circumscribing sexuality in the young---especially coming from a source like Merck. Science today has been so politically compromised that history is really a better guide in many cases.

      The reason so many young people are clueless and unprepared is again a modern phenomenon; the result of dumbed-down schools and sexual repression instigated by feminism. Female relatives of mine within living memory were married at 14, 15, and 16 years and raised families and managed households quite capably.

      Delete
    4. Without any scientific evidence and the law isn't in your favor either, when I can disregard your private opinion on the subject.

      Delete
    5. Veritas:
      When you consider that it's false science and that the laws are unjust. Most science on this subject today is heavily politically biased. Psychologists of the past like Piaget, Koffka, Ellis, Montessori, and most of the Freudians all agree that adult reasoning develops at physical puberty. As for the laws: they go against the objective standards of centuries of both legal precedent and human experience, and are based upon no objective standard.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.