Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Rachel Canning Still Alive After Being Choked by Boyfriend - DAMN!

In case anybody reading is not familiar with who Rachel Canning is, she is the New Jersey teen that is suing her parents to pay for an apartment and expenses because she "does not like living by their rules". I.E. She wants to move out, and have her parents pay for it all - instead of getting a job - which I guess she is too good for.
Rachel Canning
I cannot make this up.

Anyhoo, she found the man of her dreams - a dumbnut that will blindly do anything she tells him too.
Rachel Canning
Rachel Canning's MONGO - or whatever the f**k his name is - actually has a few brain cells - and most likely got sick of her bitchy entitlement attitude and choked her.
Rachel Canning
Rachel Canning got a restraining order against her boyfriend - then of course - dropped it. Every spoiled rotten bitchy princess needs her knight in shining armor to boss around and vent on until a medical doctor prescribes prozac or lithium.

I have just heard that his name is not MONGO - but I am not going to correct it. This mindless ass-twit STUPID enough to date this c**t isn't worthy of a name.
Rachel Canning
Rachel Canning - observe this woman carefully. She is not FAT. She is not UGLY. She is not DRESSED LIKE A SLUT.

Overall, I'd say she looks like an average 18 year old girl in America. Again, I want to re-iterate something - she is not FAT, she is not UGLY, and she is not DRESSED LIKE A SLUT.

Awkward to say the least; not just her attitude towards her own parents - but the belief that all rotten brats with entitlement attitudes are a combination of FAT, UGLY, or DRESSED LIKE SLUTS - or even FEMINISTS for that matter - found so commonly in the man-o-sphere. They are not - they come in all shapes and sizes.
Rachel Canning
Rachel Canning - she actually got a $56,000 scholarship too. I would guess that any scholarship program would be embarassed by the mere mention of her name - but not with modern academia. Psycho Entitlement Bitches are exactly the kind of women they want polluting their campuses.

Well, hopefully, she'll end up being a Murder and Male Resentment Monday - but for now - whore hum.

What Rachel Canning needs, is a good caning.

In fact, better yet...

This looks like a job for...
Guy who looks NOTHING like Harry Potter

Rachel Canning
Rachel Canning - is it me - or does this look suit her better?

Oh Me Oh My - I am advocating violence against women...

I mean, it is not like I am advocating violence against some spoiled rotten human being or anything like that. Rachel Canning has a vagina - therefore, she can act as rotten as she wants - if anybody criticizes her, well, they clearly hate ALL WOMEN, not just the spoiled rotten ones that act like little shits.

17 comments:

  1. Rachel Canning's ex boyfriends name was Lucas Kizmiller and she dropped the restraining order last year, why several people and I am included don't find her story credible. This is universal for all strangle victims (without exception), they felt they dying during the strangulation attempts, but she didn't mentioned this in report or in media interviews. Being choked and surviving is traumatizing itself, some few Survivors even experience survivor guilt, (they feel guilty about having survived the attack), but she didn't need counseling either......again her story doesn't fly with me

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I suppose that it is more likely that her, "I was strangled" story was BS and more manipulation tactics to get her way.

      What a brat.

      Delete
    2. She isn't just a brat, but a total manipulative pig.

      After a choking or strangulation attempt, when all REAL victims have external bruising, the skin is cracking and blood red eyes.

      I am just very thankful, that so many male victims of domestic violence survives these types of vicious attacks, because strangulation it most common form of violence in domestic violence, there the evil female Abuser pigs attacks their partners, when the men are sleeping

      Strangulation is the most deadly form of abuse, because it takes only 4.4 pounds of pressure on the jugular veins, it can cause a back up of oxygen-deficient blood in the brain, rupture of internal blood vessels and lack of oxygen to the brain etc.

      Delete
  2. 'Advocating violence against women.' LOL Most women seek out violent thugs in spite of all the anti-violence-against-women stuff. Maybe it turns them on when they hear advocating violence

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What most modern women want is control - to compensate for the lack of control they have over themselves.

      Look at Rachel Canning - she is out of control.

      The whole "violence against women" as well as "sexual harassment in the workplace" are just tools to women - used to control the men around them.

      Of course they seek thugs. Without the "violence against women" and other domestic violence laws in place - they would get killed by the thugs they chase.

      They want a man stupid enough to be controlled mentally - and they need the laws in place to control them physically.

      Delete
    2. And the bonus for them too is that they never have to commit fully to a relationship, Everyone will treat her as a victim if she leaves the thug---and there are plenty of government welfare handouts for victims, too.

      Delete
  3. I don't think any male or female Survivors were looking for a violent relationship. The majority were very younger, then they suddenly found themselves in a bad and violent relationship. It can happen, when we just help them, so they can move on a get better life. I always tell this to Survivors,: Maybe, they meet one rotten apple in their life, but there are +6 billion people, who never hurt them. Why they will be able to move on and NOT stay in the victim role for the rest of their natural life
    However, I know, we need more men's rights advocates or activist, because 40-50% of SA or DV victims, they are men and not women. There should be campaigns with focus on the male victims too

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I was young and stupid" - I have heard too many women say that to me.

      I think it is long overdue to stop using that as an excuse.

      Delete
    2. The majority of M/F victims were very young, when it happened. I am only interested in, they move on with their lives and don't remain in the horrible victims role for the rest of their life span. I am not a fan of Nietzsche, but he correctly wrote:"what doesn't kill you makes you stronger", why it is important to teach Survivor brothers, that they may have battle scars, but they are Survivors, "warriors", when they feel strong enough and have mentally processed everything, they should go out and conquer the world, the sky is the limit and no one stays a victim forever etc

      Delete
  4. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence
    Link:More than 40% of domestic violence victims are male, report reveals

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DV happens to everybody - not just women. That is a fact. However; feminists focused only on the DV towards women, and that seriously skewed the law.

      Focusing only on the men that are abused would inevitable have the same effect.

      Saying something corny like "DV effects PEOPLE" is the kind of gibberish that the MHRM would say.

      I think it is time to get rid of Domestic Violence once and for all - violence is violence - whether it is domestic or not makes no difference.

      Remember - it was the feminists that first introduced the concept of "domestic violence" as well as "marital rape".

      violence is violence - rape is rape.

      There should never have been a distinction made to start with.

      Delete
    2. I agree with your assessment, because 1) DV can happen to men or women and 2) male victims do NOT get any attention and help and 3) violence is violence and rape is rape, that simple.

      I don't care what the feminists think, feel or define anything, because I have rejected feminism and them (feminists). I stopped dealing with female DV Survivors, because 1) men don' get enough help, the vas majority are forced to fend for themselves, that is unacceptable and 2) I intensely dislike feminists, they are creeps and treated male Survivors like shit. In some cases, the nasty hags resorted to victims blaming.... the hags are 100% anti-man, they hate men and deeply unprofessional and 100% man-haters, why I want nothing to with them in any way, shape or form

      All SA/DV organizations have turned into industries (cash cows), they only interested in profit, why feminist "scholars" redefine rape all the time, they want to artificially inflated the statistics, because the greedy Miss Piggies (lol Miss Piggy is the new US feminist icon) want more money and don't give a shit about the victims. The main bulk of money, it was used on administration and never benefit the victims of violence.

      Delete
    3. In my eyes and what is men's best interest, Male Survivors need their own battered centers, shelters and be protected from their abusers, and feminists ....

      Delete
  5. Rachael Canning and Emma Sulkowicz: two fine specimens of the types of women men expect to find at colleges these days...

    ReplyDelete
  6. The biggest mistake the boyfriend made? LETTING GO

    ReplyDelete
  7. The biggest mistake the boyfriend made? LETTING GO

    ReplyDelete