Saturday, October 18, 2014

Consent + Contempt = Contradiction + Extortion

I know that The Anti-Feminist frequently talks about the "pussy cartel", and I agree with his assessment.  However, I think that is just one of the bigger pieces in a larger puzzle.

I think back on the relationshits I have been in; the number of women I have actually threatened to call the police on; the number of women I have grabbed by the arm and escorted to my front door; the number of women I have just walked out of a restaurant/coffee shop/bar/club on.

It is quite extensive.

In Manhood Academy terms, this is called the "Application of Pain".  And I know that ass-clowns like Futrelle like to take things out of context.  When Manhood Academy mentions the "Application of Pain", they are not referring to being physically inept.  It is the masculine way of saying "negative re-enforcement".

Yes - listen carefully...

If a woman you are with starts yelling at you for no good reason, escort her out the door, or leave.  Do not defend yourself against outrageous accusations, do not listen to her and address her "needs" and/or "feelings".  

Get her out of your immediate proximity and out of your life.

Anyway, to my point - I have also known many men who get into relationshits - and their women go psycho on them too - for no good reason.

It is NEVER for a good reason.

And by the way - the whole "PMS" excuse - is just that - an excuse - DO NOT BELIEVE THAT CRAP.   Yelling at somebody you are in a relationshit with (for no apparent reason) is never justified - ESPECIALLY NOT BY PMS.

I think that many women know that they are incapable of conducting themselves in a pleasant and civilized manner in a relationshit.  Hence, they need marriage and its blackmailing/extortion-like properties.

Without it, there is no way they could keep a man in their lives 

marriage
The woman in the picture above - how long until she goes psycho-bitch on you once your start dipping your spoon in her pudding?

And in the rare event that any feminazis are reading - no - I did not just have a spat with my GF.  No, I am not bitter because I cannot get laid - I had sex last night.  No - I do not have a small penis (got a BIG one).  No - I do not live with my mom.  No - I do not have mother issues - I visit and talk to her regularly.

Your "projection" shaming tactics have gone way beyond retarded and into hyper-f*cktarded.

Friday, October 17, 2014

Consent, Contempt and Contradiction

I have been pondering something lately.  I ask people why "people", and by "people" I mean women, should get so much money when a divorce occurs.

I associate with a diverse crowd, comprised of relatives, people I work with, and people I went to high school with, relatives of friends etc...

The most prominent answer is something along the lines of "Well, to make sure that nobody gets taken advantage of.".  By nobody - they mean "no women".

With nearly 75% of women aged 18-24 attending college and racking up huge debts to acquire worthless degrees that will not help them pay back their debt, most women come out of the gates deeply in debt.

Any man stupid enough to marry them - scratch that - any "well to do" man stupid enough to marry one and take on half of her debt while at the same time signing half of his money now and half of is future earnings over to her - is either oblivious to reality or a complete retard.

Marriage has nothing to do with love - never has.  It also has nothing to do with sanctity or holiness - never has.

Marriage is about punishing men.  Punishing men for having sex.  The feminists have simply upped the price of the modern day wife (i.e. long-term hooker).

Now, back to the "oh, that poor women" bullsh*t.  If any woman is not capable of being in a relationship without being "taken advantage of", then she has no business being in a relationship in the first place.

In theory, this is why "age of consent" laws exist right?

RIGHT?

So that evil men cannot take advantage of delicate little flowers that are just blossoming into womanhood (ralph gack puke).

The strange thing here - and hence, the contradiction part - is this...

It seems that if women need such biased divorce laws that entitle them to the children, money and the house - then those women should not get into a relationship in the first place.  After all - they are capable of being taken advantage of - just like the "children" that the age of consent laws protect eh?

I've covered consent and contradiction.

My conclusion - it seems like the consent and contradiction lead the third part - CONTEMPT.

Contempt for male HETEROsexuality.  Contempt for males.  Contempt for men.

The consent is merely a cover for the contempt of males and male sexuality.  That is why it is such a contradiction.


It is all quite awkward isn't it?

Friday, October 10, 2014

My God...It's all Full of $h*t!

So, here in Reno Nevada on the news, they have been talking about gay marriage ad nauseam.

I ask myself, "Do I support gay marriage?"  because that is the question they want everybody asking themselves.

Then I say, "Crap...I do not support straight marriage - so I guess I have to not support gay marriage".

Here is what is weird.

Side 1 - the gays - so, these people claim that they have been persecuted throughout history - yet - they are willing to register with the government (via marriage license) as to who and what they are.  This was how Hitler dealt with the Jews - it starts with registration.  Aren't gay people capable of conducting their relationships without the government getting involved?  And, shouldn't gay people of all understand the problems that arise when the government starts meddling in people's "love lives"?

Side 2 - the religious fanatics - "We have to protect the sanctity of marriage!".  When I hear them say this, I wonder, "What planet are they from - and could I borrow their spaceship?".

For years, women have been getting all kinds of poison spilled into their ears, making most of them extremely paranoid and mistrusting of men.  Most of them complain about a thing called "misogyny" whilst at the same time applauding men they do not know getting drugged, tortured and sexually mutilated.

As this poison spreads, a lot of people enact more sexually biased divorce laws in favor of women - all in the name of ending this thing called "misogyny".

So, where are the religious leaders putting a stop to all this poison?  Oh yeah - most of them help spread it - except the parts about birth control, abortion, and as of late - homosexuality.  Sorry, but when I was younger I attended church regularly - I heard the preachers yacking about the evils of lusting after women, and the evils of married men and women "experimenting in the bedroom" - I never once heard anything against homosexuality or child molesting.

Why isn't the LGBT community putting a stop to any of it?

So, there seem to be two groups these days that support marriage - the LGBT community (not to be confused with BLT sandwiches) and the religious fanatics.

Two opposing factions right?

Isn't it interesting how neither of these two groups have EVER done anything to help heterosexual relations?

We are constantly being beaten over the head with images and news flashes of these two groups over the issue of gay marriage - we are being lead to believe that they are opposing factions.
Like it says above - seems like bullshit to me.

I can understand the governments position...  After all, there is a marriage strike.  Most wealthy men are not getting married because there is too much financial risk involved.  Add onto that, the fact that most women no longer trust the upper crust - the men of strong character - and it is clear those well-to-do men have a skimpy supply to begin with...

The government is solving the low divorce rate (and hence moremoney being dumped into the economy via divorce lawyers, house foreclosures etc...) caused by the low marriage rate by broadening its consumer base - and legalizing gay marriage - despite popular opinion.

When I see religious fanatics and homos I no longer think of them as opposites.  They are flips sides of the same smelly, dirty, disgusting coin that should just be thrown into the gutter where it belongs.

Ask yourself  this - who is considered worse these days...
A middle aged man having sexual relations with an 18 year old female?
A middle aged man having sexual relations with a 18 year old male?
Two middle aged males having sexual relations?
Two middle aged women having sexual relations?
A middle aged woman having sexual relations with an 18 year old male?
A middle aged woman having sexual relations with an 18 year old female?
David Futrelle having sexual relations with a kitten?

FRIDAY!!!! Enjoy your weekend all!

Friday, October 3, 2014

Sexually Frustrated Carpet-Munching "Feminist" Gender Queers Upset at Totally Cool Subway Commercial

I do not know about you, but I will be eating at Subway this Friday night. I love their commercials; I love their healthy and delicious food.

Subway Rules!
Unfortunately, there are some twilight-saga, Oprah-worshipping shut-ins in the world whose brains are akin to scrambled eggs. Such people make insane and queer claims, about totally cool commercials being "sexist", like the one below...
I do not see what the problem is. I mean, the woman is not the one making the sandwiches - like I always hear so many women (feminists) complaining about.

The strange thing is, I frequent Subway quite often - because their food is delicious, healthy and inexpensive - and I always see women working behind the counters. They are friendly and courteous. It is kind of Subway to hire so many female employees - perhaps even hire ones with degrees in Womyn's Studies, since such a degree is worthless - unless you plan to make sandwiches for a living (ironic isn't it?).

This weekend, I will be frequenting Subway several times, because I do not feel like cooking myself. I will be enjoying their affordable variety of delicious and healthy sandwiches for several of my meals this weekend.

My favorite – is

6” Italian herb and cheese bread.
Turkey
Swiss cheese
Mustard & Mayonnaise
Cucumbers
Lettuce
Green Bell Peppers
Onions

Sometimes, I put pickles or peperoncinis on my sandwich too.

Enjoy a healthy, delicious and inexpensive subway sandwich sometime this weekend!

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

I Am Sexism, Now, More than Ever

They say that the human mind has no boundaries.  They say it has an infinite memory capacity.

What they do not say, is that it also has a limitless capacity for lunacy.

Here is the latest "sexist" T-shirt (good f**king grief)

Carpet Muncher Blogger PJ Curtis discovered a t-shirt in the junior’s section of Walmart that reads, "Training to be Batman’s wife," in purple lettering with a pink Batman logo. "The idea that you should settle for being married to or sleeping with someone awesome instead of being the awesome person is insulting,"

...Claimed the bitter angry carpet munching lesbo gender queer...

Sexist?  SEXIST??

Batman is not even real.  Finding a comical T-shirt to be a threat speaks volumes about the women who call themselves feminists.

Also, is this really sexism?  Whatever happened to "unrealistic expectations"?  Remember women whining about that crap?

Does this shirt set unrealistic expectations for men - now - they all have to be like "Batman" in order to get married?!

Dang, it is all just plain silly if you ask me.

I cannot believe that garbage like this even makes the news.

I'm gonna call her "PJ CUNTis"

Friday, September 26, 2014

Rejection Projection?

Well, somebody named "Rose" left this comment a while back...

Yes we, women, may have "tantrums" but it is extremely RARE for us to go and commit a mass murder, or any murder at all unlike some men (and I said SOME) who decide that's what you do when a female turns you down. Males have a higher rate of violence than females.

She Left Two Links:

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded/expandhomicidemain

http://www.safehorizon.org/index/what-we-do-2/domestic-violence--abuse-53/domestic-violence-statistics--facts-195.html

So, what is my problem this statement?

..."when a female turns you down"

Elliot Rodgers was NEVER REJECTED BY ANY WOMEN.  I read his fagifesto - at one point, he mustered up the courage to say "hi" to a woman (and ONLY ONE WOMAN).  I do not recall any rejection occurring.  He seemed to think that just walking down the street, women would magically appear and walk up  to him and have sex or something.  When that did not work, he started shooting people with orange juice with a super soaker.

I have never tried squirting orange juice on people with a super-soaker - and I am no student of "game", but my guess is that such an action would not help one acquire "chicks"...

Myself, when I was in college, I was at first eager to meet young women my age.  Unfortunately, the types of responses I got to saying "hello", "hi", "how goes it" etc... were quite uncivilized and hostile.

Number of killing rampages I have gone on: 0.

So - what the hell?  I was rejected (many times and never accepted) - I never went on a murderous rampage...

My second problem

..."Yes we, women, may have "tantrums" but it is extremely RARE for us"...

I have encountered this with a lot of women.  Notice the WE and US in that sentence.  She assumes that all women are exactly like her.  Hence, the WE and US.

I give her credit for saying "SOME" men when referring to psychos like Elliot Rodgers - but - I have to give her a bit fat juicy F right in her kisser for not making the same distinction with women.

Seriously - ponder it - how many women have you met who say things like "us women" or "we girls" etc...  They make it sound as if all women are alike - no differences...

Awkward to say the least.

Third problem.

Women tend to commit emotional violence instead of physical violence, which is NOT a crime...  That does not mean that women are less violent than men.  It simply means that they are violent in different ways.  "Rose" admits this - as she refers to "tantrums".  

If emotional violence were illegal - how much of the female population would be in jail over the next year?

And - Sorry "Rose" - I am not being hostile here - just using you as an example...

If you are reading this, do you understand that Elliot Rodgers was NEVER REJECTED because he never made any advances?

Also, do you understand that not all women are like you?

Anyway, I hope anybody reading this enjoys their weekend.

I know I will - I usually do!  Even though I have a small penis, am confused about my sexual orientation, and do not know how to make women have multiple orgasms according to a slew of hateful E-mails I have been getting bombarded with lately!

The fun never stops!!!!

Thursday, September 18, 2014

T-Shirt Turmoil!!!

Well, some of you may have heard some stories in the news about many school kids being asked to dress differently than they currently do. They are being asked to wear different shirts, because the ones they wear raise questions about sex, are distracting, or make political statements. The latest (as fart as our reporters know) is the case of Chloe Rubiano, a 13 year old prudish attention whore student.

The picture below is the one that got the little prudish penis hating attention whore young girl so much attention...As you can see, the shirt reads, "Virginity Rocks"
Psycho-Bitch T-Shirt
The reporters at RIP-Factor are dedicated to getting you the WHOLE story. We found the original picture of her "nasty T-shirt" and here it is...
Chloe Rubiano
JUST AS WE SUSPECTED! Chloe Rubiano - you dirty little whore!!!!

The principal of the school recommended that Chloe's friends be given a good spanking, because Chloe is a fuck ugly prudish attention whore that would be no fun to spank that is far too young to be making statements about increasing the incidents of prostate cancer in men stupid enough to wait until marriage (or go for fuck ugly prudish attention whores) - but some of Chloe's friends are older and kind of hot claimed the principal, "Bring them in for a good spanking" he said to our reporters.
She Just Needs a Good Spanking

Of course, the BACK of the "Virginity Rocks" T-shirt - it reads as follows...
Psycho-Bitch T-Shirt
The psycho-bitch modern Christian woman T-shirt hit the shelves when all hell broke loose and the 4th angel sounded its trumpet.

RIP-Factor reporters again bring you the whole story - lower on the back of the T-shirt, it reads like this...
Psycho Bitch T-Shirt

Another female student was in hot water for a T-shirt she wore that read, "gay? fine by me.". The principal of the school actually had a functioning brain, and realized what the shirt worn by the female student was REALLY saying...
Psycho Bitch T-Shirt
The principal wisely suspended her - upside down from a tree - and poured molten glass into her rectum.
I Poured Molten Glass into Her Rectum

All of the women in the photo below are also in "hot water" not because their T-shirts are revealing, make a political statement, or anything like that - they were simply reamed for having some seriously nice tits! ...and of course, they were also reamed for setting unrealistic expectations for young women's tits.
Nice Tits!
Our reporters claimed that they would like to rub their face in each and every one of their boobs while going "bbb-b-b-b--b-b-b-bbbb-b-b--b-b-b-b-b--bbb" and stuff.

If you are interested in purchasing any of the T-shirts you saw in this blog post, GET SOME FUCKING HELP, or feel free to visit
www.psycho-bitch-t-shirts.com

The Anti-feminist posted a link to this article. Scroll down quite a ways and read the top comment - like it on facebook - it currently has 951 likes!!!