Tuesday, July 29, 2014

What's Wrong with this Statement?

So, I recently saw a commercial on the television that claimed that 33% of all traffic fatalities involve alcohol.

I took that to mean that 33% of traffic fatalities are caused by people driving drunk...

Does that sound right?

Well, that also means that 66% of traffic fatalities are caused by people NOT drinking.

Doesn't it?

So, the majority of traffic fatalities are caused by people NOT drinking.

Therefore, everybody should drive drunk - there would only be 1/3 of the fatalities...

Can anybody tell me what is wrong with my line of reasoning?

Yes, this is sarcasm.  I am stating this to make a point - I hate statistics.  Not only are 98% of all statistics made up on the fly, but you can take them to mean whatever you want - even if it is something seriously screwed up.

So - to the fruitelle-cakes in the world who are reading this - NO - I am not encouraging people to drive drunk - if you have been drinking, get a cab or phone a friend to drive you home.

I wrote this post to make a point about statistics - and how meaningless they ultimately are.

Knowing that, think about how many silly stats and factoids are floating around out there...

Think about how many people blindly accept any statistic presented to them.

(According to studies, 78.7% will blindly accept any statistic provided to them).

Sunday, July 20, 2014


I just read a very short, and very good post at The Black Fedora's blog.

I am not into the whole "blue pill red pill" thing, I do not identify with MRA's, MGTOWs and a lot of the man-o-sphere, but Richard made an excellent point.

By moaning, acting miserable , or complaining, you can demonstrate that the feminists et al are winning the game - they are making you miserable.  They are re-enforcing puritanical ideals that nobody should be happy ever.  Every smile must be wiped off the face of every human on the planet.

Originally, this blog was going to be a slew of "in good taste" sexist humor.  Humor that pokes fun at some of the biases in our society against men.

I am not a grimly serious person, but at times, reading articles in the "man-o-sphere" can really get to me - their anger can easily become my anger.

That is one reason there are certain blogs I do not bother to visit.  Life is too short to spend it being angry and bitter.  And honestly, sure, there is a lot to be bitter and angry about...but isn't that what feminists et al want?  For men to be unhappy?

I believe it is.

When I poke fun at feminists, it seems to really rub them the wrong way.

Check this out.

Friday, July 11, 2014

Friday Meme

Truth hurts don't it?

I like this meme.  I think I'll duplicate it as many times as I can, and re-post it later.

Have a great weekend all.

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

I Am Misogyny, And So Can You!

Yeah, I am a misogynist, and so are you.  Do you know why?

Because everybody on the god-damned planet f**king is by the insane definition of those that wield that word and constantly beat it over everybody's head.

Even women and feminists are misogynists.

An example - sex positive feminists are misogynistic if they appear in porn, because they are being degrading to women.

Crap - pictures are worth a thousand words - here are 7000 words to express my disgust with that word - a word that never should have been brought up in a society that holds the safety, well being and comfort of women in such high regards - misogyny my a$$.

Yeah, Easy to practice, because pretty much everything qualifies as misogyny in the insane lunatics minds that like to use the word... The same lunatics who apparently have a hard time spelling it...

Hmmm. Looks like even people who stand against the insanity of the loonies that constantly scream "misogynist" are themselves, kind of well - insane.

Humor and truth combined - makes one hell of a powerful message!

A typical example of a woman who supports "equality" and will call you a misogynist if you disagree with anything she says...

"I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a woman" - dang - now that is f**king funny!

This one personifies me quite well - the problem - for some reason, women get real fugly to me when they use words like "misogynist"...

From "The Native Canadian" - In times of deceit, truth is considered "hate speech" and "dangerous" - sound familiar?

Anyway, I read a post from That INCEL Blogger about Paul Elam and others - it was nicely written, and quite informative.

Stop worrying about people calling you a misogynist - you are a misogynist - not matter what the f**k you do.

It is a time honored phrase, "Damned if you do, Damned if you don't.".

If you are a man, women (feminists) will call you a misogynist - no matter what the f**k you do. I would say to a lesser (more subdued level) they will also hate you just for being a man. Remember "The Talk" - and the all female panel and all female audience cheering and applauding the drugging, torture, and sexual mutilation of a man THAT NOT ONE SINGLE ONE OF THEM KNEW PERSONALLY.

I know where the real misogyny is in our society is...

Misogyny is right at the end of the rainbow that now shoots out of every woman's ass.

Saturday, July 5, 2014

Michael Morton and Corrupt Public Officials

I have not posted in a while, I have been brainstorming.  I watched a documentary about a man named Michael Morton. A brief glimpse of the documentary...

What I liked about it- it does expose the fact that many District Attorneys and public officials have too much monetary motivation, and too much power with NO ACCOUNTABILITY when they withhold evidence, tamper with witnesses, or commit fraud in the courtroom.

Many people would believe that Public Prosecutors are idealistic young people that want bad people to go to jail.  After I watched this documentary, I realize that they are nothing of the sort.  They do not care about justice, they do not care about sending innocent people to jail.  They care about winning (boosting their own ego), and money.

A quick rundown (if my memory serves), Michael Morton was convicted of killing his wife.  Public officials withheld the fact that a bandana was found (either in his yard or in his house) that did not belong to Michael Morton - but the real killer.

Michael Morton served more that 20 years in jail for murder because of corrupt public officials.  He got out of jail with the help of the innocence project - a charity that I used to donate money to.

Anyway, I have really been inspired by The Anti-Feminist's recent expose on David Futrelle.  It reminds me of various articles I read (not on AVFM) about Mary Kellett and her corrupt practices.

I think that people like Dworkin, Futrelle, Kellett and others need to be exposed to the public for what they really are.

Unfortunately, when I did research into David Futrelle all I came up with is the fact that he used to write stock investment tips or something like that.

It would really be nice, to have a site or blog devoted to exposing these people, and perhaps some non-violent and legal activism suggested on how to get these people out of public offices or positions of power.

If anybody has any suggestions on how to go about doing that, feel free to comment...

Friday, June 20, 2014

David Futrelle is a Homosexual Pedophile Rapist

As Dr.  Rookh Kshatriya claims, the underlying male-hatred in our society (or as I call it, heterosexual hatred) is due to the fact that many of it's "founding fathers" are in fact homosexual pedophiles.  Make no mistake here either.  When I say pedophile, I am not talking about teenagers - I am referring to prepubescents - you find this mentality of boy-raping lunatics in cults (a future post I will make). Because of this insane hatred of straight adult males, any form of adult male sexuality will be hated.  In days past it was referred to as "lust".  Today, it is referred to as "misogyny".  Being a full grown man, and admiring a woman's figure is "objectifying her" and considered disrespectful.  What about doing the same to a prepubescent boy - you never hear people complaining about that - they do not care -it is a HATRED of ADULT MALE HETEROSEXUALITY that infects them.  Today, many people supporting this polluting attitude call themselves feminists.

The following text is a re-post from the Anti-Feminist's blog.

MonsterBoobz – David Futrelle and his Disturbing Defence of a Film that Consists Almost Entirely of Graphic Scenes Depicting the Sexual Abuse and Torture of Naked Children

David Futrelle once described an adult male's fantasy of violently sexually assualting a random boy in a bar as 'tender' and 'erotic'. Writing about this, I posed the question - if this was Futrelle's idea of a 'tender' homoerotic yearning, what would his definition of a more hardcore sexual fantasy involving teenage boys possibly consist of?

Sexually humiliating them? Forcing them to eat human faeces? Mutilating them? Torturing them before murdering them?

No. Futrelle apparently accepts that these evil depravities should not be the subjects of sexual fantasy. We can all breathe a sigh of relief. Especially our teenage sons.

For according to Futrelle, such things are the theme of great art, not sexploitation.

Even when sold in seedy gay bookstores. Even when one of the boy actors later killed himself. Even when the homosexual director of the movie was murdered soon after the film was completed by a teenage boy he was exploiting in real life. Even when the film is officially banned in at least 15 different countries and is routinely described as the most appalling and grotesque ever made.

David Futrelle was an active freelance writer back in the 90's, writing for both online and offline liberal publications that included Salon, and 'In These Times'. Quote-mining from the many articles he wrote in this period, we find that he claimed that an age of consent above 12 is apparently nothing more than prudish feminists 'controlling the sexuality of young girls', described the sexual fantasy of violently assaulting a random boy in a bar as 'tender' and 'erotic', suggested that child rape victims be encouraged to marry their abusers (who would be spared jail), repeatedly accused the world's leading child protection organizations (such as the NSPCC) of generating hysteria and lies over child abuse, and railed against the first government efforts to protect children from online paedophilia and porn.

Describing some of these shocking and outrageous viewpoints of David Futrelle, I wondered what more dark secrets and even more disturbing quotes were still to be found in the dusty internet archives, amongst the hundreds of pieces he wrote for his liberal 'sex positive' feminist audience back in the 1990's. I specifically mentioned that the thought of what still might be discovered sent a shiver up my spine...and likely his too.

I wasn't wrong.

David Futrelle and his Defence of 'Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom'

How would you describe a 'man' who not only cried 'censorship' against the authorities for clamping down on a sexploitation film that contained graphic scenes of children being raped, tortured, forced to eat excrement, mutilated, and then murdered, but went on to argue brazenly that the authorities themselves should face arrest for attempting to censor it?

PDF File Here

Most normal, sane, moral people would call such a film beyond evil. One of the traumatized male child actors, who would have been only 15 or 16 when the sickening movie was filmed, in which he is made to eat the shit of his abuser before having his nipples burned off, later killed himself through a drug overdose at the age of just 33. Today, such a film would undoubtedly be classed as category 5 child pornography (the very worst). Writing about the movie back in the 1990's, David Futrelle judged it only as being 'not exactly family entertainment'.

In fact, he also suggested that instead of arresting the men distributing the 'art' movie at a notorious gay sex shop, that the police should themselves be arrested for 'renting films that go over the head of the average undercover cop'.

Futrelle's defence of the film seems to rest entirely on the status of the director - Pier Paolo Pasolini - as an 'artistic genius'. The director, a homosexual, was murdered soon after the movie's release. It is believed that the killer was a teenage male prostitute that Pasolini was abusing (unrelated to the movie), although others suspect that it may have been the work of an outraged family member of the young cast, who were all aged between 14-18.

This grotesque sexploitation movie is officially banned in 15 different countries, although, as stated above, it should undoubtedly be automatically classed as the worst form of child pornography. Its defenders claim that it makes an artistic statement about the 'corruption of power over innocence and youth'. The abusers in the film are portrayed as Italian wartime fascists who kidnap eight teenage boys and girls and subject them to 120 days of grotesque sexual torture and humiliation before murdering them. I have not watched the movie, and never will, but according to most online reviews and descriptions, it consists almost entirely of the graphic depiction of these tortures, with the teenage cast of victims, aged as young as 14, looking genuinely terrified.

Despite the film's supposed artistic statement about fascism and the corruption of power, and hence justification as an 'art movie', rather than porn or sexploitation, it is unclear why the director was homosexual, the audience of the film appears to be mainly homosexual, most of the positive online reviewers of the movie appear to be homosexual, why most of the movie's focus is aparently on the graphic sexual torture of naked underage boys, and why the movie was being rented out in a Cincinnati 'gay and lesbian bookstore' that deals mainly with erotic homosexual products.

Wikipedia - 120 Days of Sodom

IMDB - 120 Days of Sodom

An Amazon customer's review (yes, unbelievably this is still being sold openly on Amazon) :

I have read the reviews of what a deep movie this is and the important social message. What I saw was a badly acted porno with some near vomit-inducing moments. It's as if the director was looking for an excuse to portray acts of pedophilia and extreme cruelty and then calling it art to justify it. How anyone can sit through this more than once and get some kind of enjoyment from it is beyond me.

David Futrelle still tries to incite violence against a frail old man for a misquoted comment made nearly half-a-century ago.

Excellent job Mr. Anti-Feminist!

Have a nice weekend all!

Friday, June 13, 2014

A Dark Day in Human History...

It is truly a dark day in human history, when there are 4 people on T.V., and Dean Esmay is the only one NOT making a complete fool out of himself.
I wish I could call this a victory, and in some ways it is, but in other ways, it isn't.

Have a nice weekend, despite the fact that even a dunce cap from AVFM can put a feminist and fellow cohorts to shame on national T.V..