Wednesday, August 27, 2014

"Femiservative"

If you read man-o-sphere blogs as I do – you have no doubt come across this term.

Let’s start by pointing out the obvious – this week near Reno, is burning man
A festering of trashy left-wing extremists/drug addicts and just basic human excrement. I recently watched a documentary on Burning Man called Spark. A dreary documentary to be sure – but good grief – it really did demonstrate some of the rubbish that attends that festival. The problem – many good looking women also partake in said festival. This is no surprise to people in the man-o-sphere. Young attractive women often go for thorough losers – I will not give the dignity of terming them “thugs” or “alpha thugs” here – many are physically weak – and most are mentally/emotionally inferior (not just cerebrally but cortex wise as well – they lack basic motor skills to perform any sort of martial skills). What they do have is a disregard for human life (or at least the stupidity to not consider the consequences of their actions – like say murder) – something that will arouse or lure many young women. Unfortunately, as I point out on this blog (Murder and Male Resentment Monday - not for a while - got an oldie and a goodie comin' up!) – such disregard for life in said men often leads to the woman’s own demise – that is when I laugh.

That said – let’s head back to “femiservatives”.

Now, as I understand it, a femiservative is basically a post-feminist woman who enjoys all of the liberations that radical feminism ALLEGEDLY provided, whilst pretending to oppose feminism at all turns, and of course, a member of the conservative party.

Yeah – that is a confusing definition. Lets look it up on google shall we? (only 5 pages of results – many just comments – some of them my comments)

From Robert Lindsay (quote in faggot pink)

Femiservatives are basically conservative feminists or conservatives who do the feminists’ bidding for them. For instance, around 1920, a femiservative outfit called the Women’s Temperance Union put into place California’s age of consent laws, putting them at 18, which was very high for the time in an era when many females were marrying at 14 or 15. This same WTU was also responsible for the atrocity of Prohibition.

Interesting quote – but to start, he mis-named the group – the group was in fact called Women’s CHRISTIAN Temperance Union or wCtu

It was in fact a CHRISTIAN group, not a conservative group – nice try. So, a CHRISTIAN group made the age of consent 18. I wonder – where in the Bible does it say, “Thou Shall Not Have Sex with a Woman Under the Age of 18!” – Is that the 12th commandment? I am pretty sure that the Bible says NO SUCH THING. If that is correct – why would a CHRISTIAN group be so adamant to make the age of consent for SEX 18?  I ask - any Christians reading this?  What if I want a 17 year old to be the mother of my children - am I committing a sin?
Remember - priests porking altar boys in the a** disapprove of you looking at this 17 year old.

And the kicker - that "age of consent" does NOT include the altar boys getting f**ked in the a**.

Anyway - that was 1920? Anything newer?

Some “femiservatives” want to ban porn – just as the radical feminists did:

From "Mashable"

femiservative Dr. Laura Schlessinger published a similar manual titled ‘The Proper Care and Feeeding of Husbands.’ The title alone sounds like a Department of Agriculture brochure on raising livestock. But that’s how women view all men (as pigs).

Quote from Wikipedia in faggot pink.

In 1998, Schlessinger was in a Costa Mesa surf shop with her son when she began perusing the skateboarding magazine, Big Brother. On her radio program, Schlessinger declared the magazine to be "stealth pornography." When the owner of the store publicly denied that she found pornography in his store, Schlessinger sued him for lying, claiming that his denial had hurt her reputation. When the case went to court, the judge dismissed her suit, but the shop owner's $4 million defamation countersuit lodged for hurting the reputation of his store was allowed to stand. The suit has since been settled, but the terms of the settlement have not been revealed.

Sounds like Andrea Dworkin – “stealth pornography” – WTF!!! The odd thing is that Laura Schlessinger practices Judaism – I suspect that her “insane rage” against porn stems from that – not being a conservative.

One incident that makes me weary of the term “femiservative”…

I remember how the hard-core-left-wing feminazi’s attacked Sarah Palin

That link above is one modest example.

I did not wonder for one second why there was so much hatred for Sarah Palin – I never wonder why there is hatred when feminists are involved – after all, feminism is a HATE MOVEMENT.

But, researching Sarah Palin, I cannot really find anything on her (except for hearsay from various man-o-sphere blogs) about what a man-hater she is… Anybody care to contribute? (I was particularly disappointed with intellectual powerhouse "FidelBogen" who called her a "bimbo" and an "airhead" I believe - just basic name-calling - no intellectual protein).

I did hear ONE intelligent argument against Sarah Palin from a conservative – something about seeming different at first – but then just re-instigating America’s War Machine (something along those lines – I cannot quite remember). Thus far – no intelligent arguments against her from the man-o-sphere that I have seen.

Let’s look at another "femiservative" group

Well, why would any church group want to close a strip club? How many women in that church group? How many are conservative? How many are doing so because they detest male sexuality?

No leads to support any theories. But again, this is not a conservative group – this is a CHURCH group.

Hmmm. Well, it seems that there are female conservatives that have similar agendas to Andrea Dworkin (I pick the worst case feminist here for demonstration).

They want to ban porn – why? Do they do that out of a hatred of male sexuality? Or – are men in fact – the “victims” of pornography since pornography largely targets men (something akin to drug dealing only to one demographic?)

I would conclude (from some very flimsy evidence on the internets) that “femiservatives” are real – but very rare.

In fact, I’d say they are rare enough to also suggest that the term is coined by misguided left-wing MRAs/MGTOWs or whatever in order to preserve their political beliefs.

I would also say that ALL POLITICAL PARTIES have FAILED MEN miserably.

Now, I apologize to anybody that I offended by pointing out the ties to anti-male-sexuality and organized religious groups – but that does seem to be one tie – the political party has nothing to do with it.

Where in the Bible does it say something like, “Thou Shall not offer silver nor gold to see a woman’s breasts”???

How about the Qur’an?

How about the Torah?

One thing that I find curious – specifically when it comes to questioning people’s beliefs…

And let me clarify – I do not “question” their beliefs – I respect their beliefs – I simply want an explanation or an answer – give me a Bible verse – or a Torah verse – or a Qur’an verse – that says clearly in an unambiguous way – that not only are YOU NOT supposed to do "THAT Thing" – but you are also supposed to STOP EVERYBODY ELSE from doing "THAT Thing" too.

Sorry for the rant – here is the summary.

Femiservatives are extremely rare it seems. I would “guess” that it is a desperate attempt from some misguided left-wing MRA’s to salvage the trash heap that is the left wing of government.

When femiservatives do exist, it seems to stem from their religious beliefs, not from their political party – AND – as Dr. Rookh Kshatriya pointed out briefly (and I ineptly tried to point out) – those beliefs are not actually listed in the BOOKS (do not appear in actual scripture) that found their religion. It is just crap that people made up.

Please - share your thoughts - as I mentioned, there is little evidence for me to really get a solid conclusion going here - any and all input is welcome - comments containing racial slurs will be deleted.

Late Night Ponderance...

Red Pill Bullshit
Just think about it a minute...

Friday, August 22, 2014

Why I do not Care for the Police

Nothing personal.  I have been never been accused or arrested for anything serious.  I do not engage in criminal activities either - except all those tags I pulled off of mattresses.

It looks like somebody put a 2-3 foot long piece of metal into my car.  It was fastened under a piece of metal that helps hold the radiator in place.  A penny would barely fit where it was - it was looped under that narrow space, and shoved down into the fan - and looped around in front of the radiator.

What did this piece of metal do?  Well, it got caught up in the fan (which is now all scratched up from it), and the fan in turn kept knocking it into the radiator.  Last night, the radiator gave way, and cracked open.  My 1967 Camaro started smoking - I barely got it home.
The picture above shows the scratches the piece of metal made - to the right - and you can barely see the space it was lodged under too.
I opened the hood, and noticed the "awkward" piece of metal.  Today, I took it to my mechanic - I asked him if it was a piece from the Camaro - he said NO WAY.  I asked his assistant what he thought it was - he said - somebody did it deliberately.  I observed both of them carefully - neither one looked embarrassed or nervous (I hate to say this, but yes, I was suspicious of them - but - they had not worked on it in over a year).  The piece of metal is far too large for it to have been road debris too - and if it were - the odds of it making its way into the engine compartment, then looping itself around the radiator mounting bracket - with half its length going down to the fan, and the other half going in front of the radiator - beyond astronomical.

So, a radiator for a 67 Camaro costs about $200 (for a plain Jane).  Add labor...

Some prick sabotaged my car.  I call the police.

What do I get?

What I have always gotten - "There's nothing we can do about that!"

Well, I am going to do something about this.  That 1967 Camaro was my oldest brother's first car.  The piece of metal that was used is about 3/4 inch wide by about 2 feet long.

Whomever put it there had to have left some fingerprints.  Every private investigator I contacted said - "Tell the police - it is you best option for getting fingerprints off of the thing".

I had already spoken with the police at this point, and filed a report.

I tried a different angle - I told the police that I would PAY somebody to get the prints off of the piece of metal.

I understand fully that they have murderers and kidnappers to deal with, and that takes priority over my silly 1967 Camaro...

But at the same time, I also understand that getting fingerprints off of a piece of metal like what was used is feasible - according to the police I spoke to on the phone.

So, Monday, I will call the police again (the forensics department - I have the number) - and ask them if they can lift prints off of the piece of metal that was used to sabotage my car.

Now, some people reading at this point might be asking, "What good would having the fingerprints do?'"

Well, my 1967 Camaro exists in 1 of 2 places on the planet - securely locked in my garage.  If somebody were to break into my garage, my dogs would go crazy and bark up a storm.

The second place - is my place of employment.

Guess what?

Everybody at my place of employment is fingerprinted.

I have already re-spoken with some private investigators.  Two have claimed that given a set of fingerprints, they could see if it matches any co-workers of mine.

But, why is it - everytime I report a crime to the police - no matter where I have lived, no matter what the crime, no matter what circumstances - I always get "There's nothing we can do about that"???

Sorry for the O.D of B.S. from my personal life.  Got a bunch of silly posts lined up.  I'll post them when I get a chance.

Just had to vent.
Scarecrow's 1967 Camaro
My 1967 Camaro

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Remember Adventure on the Atari 2600?

Well, if you have Direct X 9.0 or higher, and do not mind downloading the Unity Web Player, you can play it on my web-site


Atari 2600 Adventure


So, what is Unity?  Simple, it is the latest piece of shit game-development system that allows functional retards to make video games.

Yeah, I am getting old and grizzled.  When I compile that Adventure game as a PC App - it takes up 11MB!!!

So - that is progress...

The latest and the greatest...

Takes up more memory, runs slower, so easy to use that any idiot can do it.

Before you know it, every idiot will be doing it.

Anyhoo, I am being forced to learn that crap for the company I work for.

Enjoy a picture of a hot babe. Defy feminism by "objectifying" her in your mind (or commit adultery with her by "lusting after her flesh" according to those queers in church butt-f**king the altar boys...).

Actually, she really isn't that hot - kinda ugly in the face - either I am getting old, or the google search engine does not have many hot babes on it.

Oh yeah - one more thing - David Futrelle is a little grimy rat-faced git that thinks boys being forced to eat feces and getting raped is "art".  He is a complete queer.  I wonder if he used to be a Catholic Priest?

Friday, August 1, 2014

Why do Women Hate Me?

So, I have been perusing blogs and noticing that quite a few of them are run by young men who are asking themselves this question.

Well, I have an answer why they hate you.

Because you are a force of logic with a huge wang.

Yup.

Think of CBS's, "The Talk" - an all female audience with an all female panel cheering the sexual mutilation of a man - most modern women hate male sexuality.  The bigger the penis, the more they hate it.

What else do most modern post-feminist women hate?  LOGIC.

So, if you are reading this, and asking yourself, "Why do women hate me?"

Just say to yourself, "Because I am a force of logic with a huge wang."  Then smile.

Say it!!!

I am a force of logic with a huge wang

Enjoy your weekend everybody - I am taking a 4 day weekend.

Feel free to use your logic and huge wang to defy feminism and its war against male sexuality at each and every turn.  If you are at a loss on how to do that, you can start by objectifying the woman below with your logic and huge wang.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

What's Wrong with this Statement?

So, I recently saw a commercial on the television that claimed that 33% of all traffic fatalities involve alcohol.

I took that to mean that 33% of traffic fatalities are caused by people driving drunk...

Does that sound right?

Well, that also means that 66% of traffic fatalities are caused by people NOT drinking.

Doesn't it?

So, the majority of traffic fatalities are caused by people NOT drinking.

Therefore, everybody should drive drunk - there would only be 1/3 of the fatalities...

Can anybody tell me what is wrong with my line of reasoning?

Yes, this is sarcasm.  I am stating this to make a point - I hate statistics.  Not only are 98% of all statistics made up on the fly, but you can take them to mean whatever you want - even if it is something seriously screwed up.

So - to the fruitelle-cakes in the world who are reading this - NO - I am not encouraging people to drive drunk - if you have been drinking, get a cab or phone a friend to drive you home.

I wrote this post to make a point about statistics - and how meaningless they ultimately are.

Knowing that, think about how many silly stats and factoids are floating around out there...

Think about how many people blindly accept any statistic presented to them.

(According to studies, 78.7% will blindly accept any statistic provided to them).

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Moaning

I just read a very short, and very good post at The Black Fedora's blog.

I am not into the whole "blue pill red pill" thing, I do not identify with MRA's, MGTOWs and a lot of the man-o-sphere, but Richard made an excellent point.

By moaning, acting miserable , or complaining, you can demonstrate that the feminists et al are winning the game - they are making you miserable.  They are re-enforcing puritanical ideals that nobody should be happy ever.  Every smile must be wiped off the face of every human on the planet.

Originally, this blog was going to be a slew of "in good taste" sexist humor.  Humor that pokes fun at some of the biases in our society against men.

I am not a grimly serious person, but at times, reading articles in the "man-o-sphere" can really get to me - their anger can easily become my anger.

That is one reason there are certain blogs I do not bother to visit.  Life is too short to spend it being angry and bitter.  And honestly, sure, there is a lot to be bitter and angry about...but isn't that what feminists et al want?  For men to be unhappy?

I believe it is.

When I poke fun at feminists, it seems to really rub them the wrong way.

Check this out.