Monday, August 17, 2015

What If Rape Were Legal?

So, I heard about this article bashing Roosh V. for ALLEGEDLY supporting rape. For the record, I am not into the PUA scene. My entire life I have been getting spoon-fed bullsh*t of "How to Pick up Chicks". From what I have read of it so far, it is the same B.S. that was going around 25 years ago.

Some of the higher liked comments are nasty... (Gotta love the CAT AVATAR in the first comment!)

Laura Thomas Under his own advice, he should have known to protect himself from the thrown beer and it's his own fault it happened. No charges should be filed because in his eyes, he should have known better.

Alex Faircloth Laughing at how he thinks throwing beer at someone deems aggravated assault, yet rape is entirely fine. Absoloutely ridiculous.
Laura Katherine Smith if somehow these charges are actually taken seriously, we should start a GoFundMe to pay for every cent of her legal bills.

I'm sorry - but are these women ADVOCATING VIOLENCE AGAINST MEN?
feminism
That is funny, because I thought, that as a man, I have a built in gizmo or something that makes me want to be violent towards women - hence - all the public service announcements on T.V., and all the laws like V.A.W.A. are in place to teach me not to beat a woman every 1.7 seconds. And of course - women IN NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM WOULD EVER IN A BILLION YEARS ADVOCATE FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST MEN...
feminism

Anyway, that article links to the so-called inflammatory piece that Roosh V. wrote.

I suggest that you read the article by Roosh V. It is very good reading. It made me wonder something...

What if rape were legal?

How much would change in everyday life? Honestly...

I know for a fact, that myself and everybody I know would just go on - continuing to not rape anybody.

Brianna Dennison - would have still been killed by James Biela. How many women's lives were saved because rape is illegal? Just that one - or hundreds?

If you believe that Bill Cosby really did drug and rape those women - then ALL of them still would have been raped - right?

Now, in case any fruitcake fruitelles are reading, I do not think rape should be legal. I just wonder - would things really change that much if it were legal?

Here is a quote from Roosh V's article - which sheds light on his inner character...

I also read that men must be taught not to rape, which means that they are all born with the capability to rape and have zero instinct to know that taking a woman with violence is improper.

He goes on to say that nobody ever taught him that the sky was blue or something like that.  He is clearly being sarcastic - and rightly so.

NOT RAPING WOMEN I believe is INHERENT to the MALE PERSONA, and NORMAL MALE HETEROSEXUALITY.

Funny isn't it... Saying that makes me a misogynist. Suggesting that rape IS inherent to male persona does not make one a misandrist.

feminism
Rape (real rape, not the feminazi definition) is due to people with bad wiring in their heads. Likewise, I have already stated on this blog that rape is a sick woman's fantasy. I stick by those assessments.

rape
Another good quote from the article by Roosh...

I learned that if a man and a woman both drink at a party and have sex, she was in all likelihood raped since she could not give full legal consent. This made me confused because a woman who drinks and has sex is not responsible for her actions, but if that same woman gets into a car and drives it into someone else, causing a loss of life, she would be prosecuted and sent to jail. I couldn't find an explanation for this inconsistency.

Again, I am not fond of the PUA scene - but I have to admit - Roosh V certainly does point out the double standards in our society as well as the intense hatred of men and male heterosexuality.

I'll have to browse the other articles on his blog - so I can remind myself why he is not in my list of links...

Monday, August 10, 2015

J. Garcia Bolsters New Line of Ties That Look Like SH*T

So, I occasionally shop for clothes. I am not typically a fancy dresser – just pants and a T-shirt. However; my job sometimes requires that I wear a full-fledged dress suit.

So, I need to buy fancy dress clothes every now and again.

I have been looking for a new tie lately. I noticed that there is a new "line" of ties called "J. Garcia".

They look like somebody asked, "Do you have any ties that do not even go with themselves?"

The response was for somebody to eat some skittles and then vomit on silk – and – POW – the "J. Garcia" collection of seriously ugly ties was born.
Ugly Ties
PUKE – GAK – RALPH

I have been looking for a new matching pocket square and tie for about 3-4 months now.

Every time I visit a store, I notice that the “Garcia Collection” is always there – and has not diminished.

In other words – I do not think anybody is buying these f*ck ugly ties. I know I certainly am not.

What is worse – few retailers bother with matching pocket squares anymore – they are a bitch to find.

Anyway, why would Macys, JCPennys, Kohls and other major retailers stock a line of ties that nobody wants to buy because they look like My Little Pony did some explosive diarrhea on them?
J. Garcia Ties are Pony Diarrhea

My current hypothesis – is that the CEO’s (or the people in charge) of these retail stores are functional retards.

My taste in semi-formal dress...

Light blue shirt with black tie, grey sports coat, gold tie clip.


Light purple shirt with dark purple tie, grey sports coat
 

Grey shirt, green tie, black sports coat.


Black shirt lavender tie with matching pocket square, grey sports coat - finding a store that actually sells pocket squares with their ties is a bee-otch..

Please do not tell me I look like a Mob Enforcer – I get that all the time and I hate that.

I usually wear these suits to court for my company - and to a less extent - to social events - and to a less extent - family court.  Based on the judges name (male or female), and reputation - is what prompts me what colors to mix (I have not had the need to wear standard white shirt with red power tie and either black or grey sports coat - I send these pics to my GF - because she likes seeing me dressed up - and when I am dressed up I usually leave for work after she does) .

Many would say this is off topic from anti-feminism. Is it? The fact that people in high places are so detached that they stock f*ck ugly clothes that nobody wants to buy (at least no straight men) is not relevant to a post-feminist society?

I get approached by retail employees, "Can I help you sir?"

I reply, "Yeah, do you sell clothes for heterosexual men?"

No - nobody gets offended, I usually get a laugh - to a less extent - I get a confused look.

I think the f*ck ugly clothes that most stores try to pawn off on men for outrageous prices is relevant to post-feminism.

The so-called "big wigs" in our society are dimwits. They believe that newer is always better, and that men will buy crass ugly ties that looked like they were jismed on by a group of masturbating M&M's with special needs


Is it me - or are these f*ck ugly ties???
.

I found that the best way to buy ties is online - there are many sites - BuyYourTies, TheTheBar and Ties are good sites to purchase ties (there are many other good sites too) - and they actually offer the matching pocket square - AND - unlike Macys, JCPennys, Kohls et al - they do not want $55 to $120 for their silk ties - you can get a quality silk tie for about $10 to $20.

Although, the problem I have with online sites, is that the color on a computer monitor is not quite the same as the color in person - I have done 2 returns in the last month. Third time is a charm...

Anyway, I am frustrated with tie shopping, hopefully, the ones I ordered online will work with the rest of my wardrobe (got a patent infringement trial coming up - I have been deposed as always).  Sorry for the rant - but - dang - I get pissed when shopping for clothes.

Is it just me???

Friday, August 7, 2015

Just Think About These Things...

Looks like I picked up a troll called "godFREE".  Ugh.  I hate trolls.  Please do not feed the troll.

As far as "Gay Bashing"goes - I think that like feminists, the LGBT community over-plays the "victim card".

There are bars that are for Gay People - they are called "Gay Bars".

What would happen if somebody opened up a "Straight Bar"?

And, Eric pointed something out to me.  Many Churchians tell older men that they are not supposed to pursue younger women.
If I remember Churchians correctly, they tell men to not pursue women - EVER.

I think that the main quote they use (in order to justify their straight-male bashing) is something like, "if your eyes follow a woman merely to lust after her flesh, you have already committed adultery with her in your heart".

That is all fine and well, but what if the woman your eyes are following is your wife?

How can you be committing adultery with your own wife?

Doesn't make sense - can anybody out there make sense of that?

I do not have time to list the hugantic items that Churchians use to bash straight men - here are a few...

"The MEN of Sodom are wicked sinners..." - How come the WOMEN of Sodom were NOT also wicked sinners?  If they were not - why did God kill all of them too?

"If your eyes follow a woman to lust after her flesh..." - So - men cannot glare or gaze at women - but women CAN glare and gaze at men?  Is this a double standard?

Sorry, I am tired - it is Friday, and I am planning a long sleep this weekend.  I was talking with a Bible Thumper on Wednesday - it seems like the Bible really does point out how many "bad and evil" men are out there - and rarely places any kind of spotlight on the misdoings of women - except to say "whore" every now and again.  And that word "whore" is usually taken by the Churchians to mean "woman who enjoys/craves sex"  - or engages in sexual intercourse (with straight men of course NOT lesbians) for pleasure... "It is an abomination for a man to lie with another man" - it does not say anything about a woman lying with another woman.  And why does it say "lie with" - how come it doesn't say "have sex with"?

Anyway, I do not bash Christianity - but I do question the motives and "end results" the Churchians are having on people.  I have noticed that cackles of men-haters seem to flock to Church these days.

There are blogs out there that suggest that feminism simply enforced the male-hatred that already existed in the Church.

Did it?

Or - did the male-hatred that existed in the Church spawn feminism?

I personally think that it is a combination of the two - like a feedback loop.

Anyway, enjoy your weekend - and enjoy burning in hell for eternity for looking at this woman
P.S. Try to remember that Churches are all about Gay-Bashing - according to Gay People.  They have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with bashing straight men...

Anybody want to buy a bridge?

Monday, July 27, 2015

Heterophobia - The Shame of Being Straight.

Heterophobia and homophobia, just like misandry and misogyny - spell check fails to recognize heterophobia as being an actual word.

It should be.

I offer this article to anybody reading...

This Heterosexual Pride Parade Could Not Have Failed Any Harder Than It Just Did.

The article itself is rather bland - it is the comments - quite the lot of them - that are slightly disturbing.

Before I highlight them, I offer my insights - and I might be wrong. I looked at the man who organized the parade. I saw no evidence that he is Christian or that he hates homosexuals or anybody in the LGBT community.

Here are the comments...

Maybe he felt opprssed, rightless, or discriminated against is right to discriminate against others. I mean as a straight, Christian, and a white man, his life must be horrific.
 
Gay-Pride events came about as a means for gay people to own their self-worth and place in society after they have been oppressed and vilified for so many years. What oppression is this sad, white, American man trying to overcome?

If you were a woman would you want to be seen with that guy?

Yeah. "Real men" always should act persecuted because they haven't lived oppressed and vilified, always being worried that they will lose their livelihood, friends and family because he happened to be born heterosexual.

That's because he used insects in one of his examples to demean gay people and they didn't appreciate it.


Notice that it is assumed that he is anti-gay, and Christian. Why? Also notice the hatred and animosity towards him. Why?!?! Is it really that bad to be straight?!?!  Also, take note of the near-hit on the catalog of male shaming tactics that are coming up too...

I am starting to think that Eric is right about something. That the whole "Gay Marriage" thing is not about homosexuals getting to marry and enjoy "marital bliss" (lol), but rather, a door opening to allow baseless straight-bashing - much like feminism opened a door for baseless male-bashing.

Well, to be fair, there is quite a bit of gay-bashing in our society - take a look at these pictures, but be sure to overt your eyes if you have a weak stomach - they are quite abrasive.

You always got the guy conceited enough to speak for the Almighty... Wait... Is he wearing PINK!?!


Gay Bashing
Aw... What a sweet little girl - sugar and spice and all that sh*t...


Gay Bashing
Bad haircut, probably bad hygiene too - so why do I like this guy???


Gay Bashing
Some gays fight back against gay-bashing...


Gay Bashing
This is my Asian counter-part... Yes, I even have a crown like that...


Gay Bashing
Even super-heros are affected by gay-bashing...


Gay Bashing
AT LAST - SOMETHING THAT IS PART-WAY REAL!


OK - enough fun.

While I do believe that "gay-bashing" exists, I question its prevalence, and I offer a challenge to anybody reading.

I want to see two people - 1 man, 1 woman in 4 repeated scenarios.

1. Reverse Cowgirl.

2. Doggy Style.

3. Sixty Nine.

4. Angry Anal.

SORRY - My train came off the tracks - ignore that - here are the 4 repeated scenarios I would like to see them in...

1. MAN APPROACHING OTHER MEN. The man approaches another man, tells the man he is gay, and sexually interested in the man - observe the reaction from the man he approached.

2. MAN APPROACHING WOMEN. The man approaches a woman, tells the woman he is straight, and sexually interested in the woman - observe the reaction from the woman he approached.

3. WOMAN APPROACHING OTHER WOMEN. The woman approaches another woman, tells the woman she is gay, and sexually interested in the woman - observe the reaction from the woman she approached.

4. WOMAN APPROACHING MEN. The woman approaches a man, tells the man she is straight, and sexually interested in the man - observe the reaction from the man she approached.

If anybody reading wants to do this - I will pay them $1000 (possibly more) - AS LONG AS I AM ALLOWED TO SUPERVISE, AND A PROPER CONTRACT BE DRAWN UP FIRST.

I suggest that the man approach at least 10 men and 10 women, and the woman approach at least 10 women and 10 men.

Would anybody reading care to place a wager on which scenario would generate the most NEGATIVE reaction?

I would place money that scenario #2 generates the most hostility. Although, it might actually be a tie between #2 and #3.

Gay-bashing - my aunt's hat.

Straights are bashed WAY MORE than gays - by everybody - yes - even the so-called "Churchians".

The LGBT community, like feminism, plays the victim card way too much, and, when they do, their hypocrisy shows.

I'll elaborate on this a bit more in my next post.

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Gay Marriage

I don't care.

For those of you who do, well - I wouldn't worry.  Look at what marriage did for heterosexual relations...

Women pretending to be interested in men - when all they are after is money - i.e. the classic gold digger.

Straight men being stripped of their civil liberties by things like primary aggressor laws, style of life costs and whatnot during a divorce.

Now, I fully understand that many people who might be reading this are religious - specifically - Christian.

That is all cool, and I know they are saying something like, "It is an abomination for a man to lie with another man" or something like that.

Forbidding gay men from getting married will not stop gay men from having relations.

And, in case any of you boneheads haven't been paying attention for the last 1000 years or so - here is how your Christian leaders portray your religious icon - Jesus Christ...
Let's see - is he wearing mascara?  Eyeliner?  Lipstick???  Blush!?!?

Let's try another picture of Jesus Christ...
WHOA!!!  FLAME ON!!!

Dr. Rookh wrote a post about how Jesus Christ is de-sexualized, or portrayed as feminine. I suggest that Dr. Rookh Kshatriya did not go far enough.  Religious leaders have not just been portraying him as de-sexualized or feminine - they have been portraying him as a raving FAG.  Look at the picture above again - and ask yourself, "If he got married - would it be to another man?"  Religious leaders have not just been de-sexualizing Jesus Christ - they have been de-humanizing him, and portraying him as flaming.

Anyway, I know that many Christians are upset with gay marriage being legal.

Don't be.  If gay marriage was NOT legal, it would not put an end to gay people.  AND - it is time overdue that homosexuals started getting burned by the same "sanctity filled" institution that has burned so many good, honest hard-working men.

Yes, marriage rates have been dwindling, and hence, so have divorce rates.  The marriage/divorce industry has been lacking in clientele, and - it seems they just found a new consumer base - the LGBT community...

Enjoy your new "right" to get married you dumb-ass faggots.

Just think - there will be people pretending to be gay just to hook up with that rich gay guy and take him for everything he has.  There will be women pretending to be lesbians just to hook up with that rich lesbian chick and take her for a ride...

It looks like Ellen might get burned for $220 MILLION in the near future... What kind of a Christian would object to that? And - what kind of a Christian at the same time would NOT object to a STRAIGHT man being taken for a $220 million dollar ride by his wife - MORE SO if she were much younger than him and totally hot...

Crickets chirping...

Dead silence...

That is what I thought.  

This has been in the making for years folks.  There is nothing new under the sun.  Religious leaders have been bashing heterosexuality WAY more than they have ever bashed homosexuality.  THIS IS A FACT.

Marriage is NOT a religious institution - it is a state run institution.  It always has been.

Religious leaders let the state run it - they were more than happy with it - because they thought they were getting their stinky dinky into the gubbamint.  Well guess what morons - marriage is a state run institution.

I often wonder - if the gubbamint made people get licenses in order to attend church - the same way they make people get licenses to get married - wouldn't they (religious people) be screaming bloody murder?

Crickets chirping...

Dead silence...

That is what I thought.

Gay marriage is legal - stand back and watch the fireworks.

Monday, July 6, 2015

Murder and Male Resentment Monday - Oldie but a Goody!

Check out this way boner-licious babe - a super model too!

Jasmine Fiore
So, was she a gold-digger like I have heard so many times in the man-o-sphere flaming faggot brigade? NOPE! Well, not really - she did not hook up with doctors or lawyers or whoever has money these days. She did hook up with a drug dealer who ended up in prison, then hooked up with a real estate investor SCAM ARTIST - Ryan Jenkins - who supposedly killed her.

Jasmine Fiore
While she was involved with Ryan Jenkins, she was having an affair with prison inmate Michael Cardosi.

Does she know how to pick 'em or what!

Jasmine Fiore
Well, it could be worse...

Instead of her badly beaten and crushed body being discovered inside a suitcase in a dumpster down an alley in Buena Park, California with her teeth, fingers and clothes removed after being strangled - she could have been involved with - dare I say it - a SELF-PURPORTED NICE GUY!!!!

Jasmine Fiore
THE ABSOLUTE HORRORS!

Thank goodness she was murdered before anything bad like that happened!

Jasmine Fiore
I apologize to the human race for a second. When I heard that her fingers had been cut off, her teeth pulled and her entire body was stuffed into a suitcase, I actually laughed. Seriously - I laughed. Am I turning into a sick bastard or what?

My laughter stemmed not from an overly-opinionated rage like found in some feminazi - No, my laughter was because of all the rotten horrible things that women have said to me when I was in college - and I often wonder, if I had approached Jasmine Fiore back then (and she were the same age as me) - would she have said something rotten like "Fuck you", "Fuck off", "Don't look at me I am too good for you", "I am like, so out of your league" etc... I guess I did deserve those things being said to me - after all, I would have the audacity to say things like "Hello", "Hi", How are you" etc... Geez - what a creep I was!

I am glad this bitch is dead - f**k you Jasmine - f**k you.

You got all the choices when it comes to sex - you picked your wine, you drank it - it was poison. I have no doubt that you look down on guys like me (who will never taste wine) with contempt.

I am glad you are F**KING DEAD JASMINE FIORE!

Revenge is best served cold.

Thursday, July 2, 2015

An Ugly Truth about Our Society Few Want to Admit…

So, I was at the Urgent Care clinic the other day – after urinating, it felt like somebody was sticking a needle in the head of my penis.

I figured that I might have a UTI, since it has been unusually hot lately here in Reno Nevada – and many people I know have been having similar problems.

Anyway, at the Urgent Care clinic I started getting angry – I was running around asking, "How come nobody has touched or even looked at my penis?"

"What kind of medical practice is this!!" I shouted.

"Will somebody please just look at or touch my penis for crying out loud!!!"

A lady came out and said, "Sir, wait until you are called to see a doctor – you are still in the waiting room – and would you please put your pants on!"


I AM KIDDING!!!

I figured that I'd start this post out with some of my "special needs" brand of humor.

Anyway, I offer Cupid Player and his videos on YouTube, specifically this one:
This guy’s videos are getting thumbed down severely.

I was trying to figure out why – are they boring to the typical YouTube viewer? I doubt it – as many comments he receives are serious put downs.

It occurred to me, that one possibility is that Cupid Player’s videos might be getting thumbed down so much because they show society "as it is".

The video above – I asked myself, "How would Hollyweird have shown the same sequence of events?"

I have no doubt that the women would have been smiling, pleasant – perhaps good natured – or perhaps direct about not being interested.

Cupid Player’s videos show real life. He is an average looking man, with an average personality.

Because of that, women see him as being "creepy" and "threatening".

As I have stated in the past, feminism has damaged our society.

Now, the insulting comments on Cupid Player's videos appear to be coming from men.

I think the ugly truth out there is that men do not want to admit – that they ARE this guy – they want to believe that somehow – they would be treated differently.

Those men are deluded.

They want to put themselves on a pedestal above other men – most likely stemming from an inferiority complex.

I do not believe that men like that should be punished – I believe that men like that need to wake up and smell the hate.